Today's France is a place where two conflicting trends exist.
First, an ever-growing consciousness from the native White population that it is endangered by mass immigration. The arrival of the National Front candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen into the second round of the presidential election of 2002 was an earthquake for the mainstream political class. For weeks, the media flooded the population with references to Nazism, the “darkest hours of our (?) history,” and other metapolitical memes. Le Pen was beaten by the incumbent president, Jacques Chirac, who won with more than 82% of the vote. Nonetheless, Le Pen's arrival at the second round and the panicked emotional reaction from the Left marked an important date.
After 2002, the abstention increased, new “youth” movements such as the Bloc Identitaire and Jeunesses Identitaires (Identitarian Youth) appeared. Think-tanks like Polémia, information websites like Fdesouche–an abbreviation for Français de souche (original French)–focusing on immigration, economy, demography and metapolitics, and symbolic public events like a 2012 meeting against Islamisation or the occupation of the top of a Mosque in Poitiers all denote a deeper trend of White awakening.
Indeed, since Le Pen's daughter Marine took the lead of the party, its electoral results kept steadily increasing. The last elections of 2014 and 2015 made the National Front the first party of France on the basis of sheer vote number. More than five million voters upheld the Front candidates. Only a game of alliances amongst the mainstream right, a so-called Union de la droite created for maintaining the bipartisanship system at all costs, was able to prevent Front applicants from being elected.
Second, while this trend is made visible and negatively presented by the mainstream media, there is another one in the background. Namely, a constant effort to empower people of “diversity”, give them an ever-growing number of privileges–from preference in employment to the moral high ground of the “oppressed”–at the expense of the original population. “Diversity” people are groomed and cherished while young Whites get out of school with no worthy diploma, no sense of inner identity, no sense of belonging.
Ironically, the pro-White trend is the only one that could genuinely be designated as “organic.” The other one bears all the signs of a top-down creation: it is funded by the corporate world, spread in the mainstream media, and produced by power networks. Rest in peace, Mr. Gramsci.
A recent book, newly edited, sheds light on how the second trend is quietly built. According to Claude Meunier-Berthelot, a long-time teacher, there are actually not one but two state-funded educational systems in France. Both work in synergy and their coupling is likely to bear dramatic consequences.
The Schools as a Tool for our Replacement
Meunier-Berthelot's book is named C'est l'identité française qu'on assasine (roughly, The Assassination of French Identity), but it could have been titled The Enslavement of the French Children. Within the public education system, some schools are more funded than the others: they are categorized as Priority Education Areas (in French, ZEP). Most of them belong to suburbs where children of Black and North African immigrants are already a wide majority. ZEPs are the vanguard of “affirmative action” and the replacement of our people. They are lavished with funds, individual attention, new material–albeit most White young teachers working there quickly lose motivation.
The first system, designed as the common right of National Education, consists in a “reformation” of schools where classes disappear at the same time that any serious requirement. This system includes all schools, from elementary to college teaching... It has been made for our children, our sons. The other one, defined as “priority education”, has been tailored specifically for the “Priority Education Areas”, i.e. the suburbs. Those populations, the majority of them immigrants, benefit from a structured teaching, with “efficient” (sic) pedagogical methods, individual monitoring, a regular check of their work and set-up requirements. The second system is fed by enormous resources. Money from our taxes flows for specific education and welfare system. Nothing is held back to create an alien elite while turning our children into future lackeys. – Claude Meunier-Berthelot
On the other side, the regular schools–where the proportion of White children is still much higher–are reformed in the exact opposite way. Educational curriculum is dumbed down, grades and formal evaluation are planned for removal. Of course, the funding is lower, too. Young White minds are shaped to not develop their potential, to remain ignorant of hard work and success, while their Black and North African counterparts benefit from increased funding, leniency, and positive attention.
A recent reform of the history curriculum unambiguously follows this plan. The study of kings Clovis and Charlemagne, of the empereur Napoléon Bonaparte, are removed. Interestingly, the Renaissance and the Enlightenment are removed as well–a strange feature as the official text pretends to emphasize the “problematics required for forming new citizens.” Study of Islam and some African “empires” are mandatory. Medieval Christianity is an option the teacher can choose, however, he must treat it from a defaming point of view of “the Church’s grip on the minds of rural people.” Today's history curriculum presents fleeting moments, without any global view able to encompass them but only an underlying message–“our” roots come from the Middle Eastern Islam and sub-Saharan Africa; France and Europe have no glorious history; France and Europe should only be mentioned as an oppressive, shameful past. In short, history classes will be nothing else than a daily feeding of poisoned blue pills.
This educational policy is not merely the production of a sectarian Left. It has also been pursued by mainstream right governments. The former president Nicolas Sarkozy spoke of “Kärcher” to clean the suburbs, promised to reestablish the value of work and uphold a “chosen immigration.” After his election, he named personalities of the cultural Left, such as the former Culture minister Jack Lang, at high-responsibility government jobs. He was also a friend of the infamous Richard Descoings, director of the main political science school of France and initiator of “affirmative action” policies for creating “diversity” quotas.
Whereas the “reformation of schools” policy for everyone stresses how much the school is simply a place for living, the texts basing the “reformation of priority education” (ZEP) policy stress the importance of “structured teaching”, “regular work” and “explicitly taught knowledge.” At least in intentions, this special teaching is grounded on transmitting knowledge and looking for excellence, and it is geared exclusively to immigration suburb inhabitants.
The aim is quite clear, especially when it comes to eased qualifications examining for entering into the better schools: give to a growing number of “visible minorities” members to access high-responsibility jobs in the media, the administrations, the corporate world, through privileged paths. This policy consists in preparing the great replacement of the elites... to the detriment of the original French populations relegated to remote suburban areas.
One can observe here the exact mechanism described the geographer Christophe Guilluy : an iron alliance between the globalized oligarchy living in city centers and immigration suburbs against the outer France of middle-size cities, urbanized rural areas and provinces. – Jean-Yves Le Gallou
There is no real difference between the elites of the mainstream Right and the hegemonic Left. The former maintains the politics of the latter. Before Sarkozy, Jacques Chirac had mentioned “the noise and smell” from immigrant large families living close to French workers. He also rallied on the theme of insecurity for being reelected. Then, what did he do? The exact same thing than the former and latter governments since at least 1976 have done, when the president Giscard d'Estaing ordered a decree to allow families from immigrant workers to come and stay. Since that year, the trend has always remained the same. Correlatively, the media and official discourse are rationalizing it by attacking the “xenophobia”, “white privilege” and other metapolitical memes essentially forged by the Left.
A Silent War
Such a continuous, rigorously maintained political system can only be the result of deep intentions. Deep politics are real, and their war is waged against us, the White people, especially the Millennial generation where many of us are on the path to downward social mobility. As a whole, we are the most sacrificed generation since the two World Wars. We are not sent to outright death on the battlefield–but we are dispossessed of everything our parents and ancestors have worked for.
Based on IQ studies, historical track record and daily experience, one could see in this monumental but occult policy an uphill battle against nature. As they say, you don't turn a pigeon into an eagle, nor can you turn a 70 IQ guy into the next Einstein. However, you can turn an eagle into a pigeon. As wrote Plato (Republic, 377c), “tell the children and so shape their souls” by chosen stories in order to give them the mindset you want. It works for developing a child's particular potential or making him an adherent of a project. As a reversal, it also works on a negative mode. Intelligent, civilized children can be dumbed down, injected with a negative view about themselves, told an incredibly dark version of the history of their ancestors, then released hapless among an anonymous, downward-mobile crowd.
The French-American Foundation (FAF), a discrete NGO working with the American Council of Foreign Relations, has spent years networking to find “tomorrow's leaders.” Promising young French have been recruited in a “Young Leaders” program and sent to the US, all expenses paid, for networking sessions. The current French President François Hollande and the former one Nicolas Sarkozy are members of the FAF. Those last years, the FAF devoted important efforts to the immigrant-peopled suburbs, indicating how much they are considered as important and promising for the future. Of course, there are some White people there–and it is likely that there will always be–but those people will be part of the system and working at higher levels. Those few Whites may benefit for some time, at the expense of all the other Whites. For some time only, because even if they belong to the heart of the system, they are an important target for a growing parasitic class.
Jacques Attali, an important Jewish consultant, claimed at the 2014 meeting of the Jewish Global Congress that a Western “Muslim bourgeoisie” shall be created. Muslims lack serious leaders, Attali said, and the Jewish community should help them: “in England, the Jewish bourgeoisie already funds imams.”
Is that altruism? Yes, provided that one accepts Attali's own definition of altruism: “intelligent egoism.” His apparently pro-Muslim strategy aims at putting them under the higher patronage of the Jewish organized community and avoid violent anti-Semitic upheavals from them. Attali–as probably everyone else at the Global Jewish Congress–doesn't care at all about the integrity of European countries—they care about creating a balance of power where they will have the upper hand. That strategy includes the abandonment of a majority of young Whites by civil society. The organized community doesn't care at all–or more likely feels a certain schadenfreude while seeing the result of their policy.
The strategy of creating an alien “diversity” elite seems to combine two features: the creation of a new balance of power, with multiculturalism dividing the inhabitants of Western countries, and a deep revenge against the European man who dared to rebel against the oh-so-bright Chosen People.
Attali also created a micro-finance society designed to grant preferential loans to the immigrants. One of the administrators of this society is a young North African entrepreneur, Younes Bourimech. As an entrepreneur and a North African, Bourimech has the perfect profile, with the addition of a particular premium: he owns shares of Therapy Music, the label behind the star gangsta-rapper Kaaris. I am not sure that gangsta-rap is the better instrument for maintaining a stable balance of power, even one that favors Jews. Nonetheless, as a metapolitical revenge tool, it is perfect: it romanticizes crime, violence, and a general thug lifestyle, usually practiced by Black and Arabs–and a few whiggers–against Whites.
Many young Whites are accustomed to life in the suburbs. They have lived in a mixed racial environment since they were born. Many of them don't imagine getting back to a state of racial and cultural homogeneity. They can't imagine what a really sane society is. After all, they have been told at school that their past story was dark and shameful, that racial mixing and the disappearance of European people was “progress.”
Most of the elite Jews in France are Sephardic. Coming from North Africa–and having never “suffered” from the Germans as they were not in Europe during WW2–those people have always lived in a racial diverse environment. I remember reading about a Sephardi who went back to France after Algeria was abandoned: he was shocked that the school classes were uniformly White. However, just like other Jews, the Sephardis have a potent sense of cultural and ethnic identity, in stark contrast to the clueless Whites who keep defending “antiracism” and blaming their conscious peers, even if it means their own dispossession.
What to do?
So far, the lack of identity and positive views among Whites has paved the way to an evil synergy between the organized Jewish community, ambitious and resentful immigrants, and a tiny minority of urban Whites who don't suffer much from the new situation. This evil synergy is built on our very behalf as a people. It has started with White bosses favoring cheap labor over employing their peers and has been aggravated when the Left shifted from the defense of the White working class to immigrants and some bourgeois urban minorities like the LGBT.
For many young French, the only solution for having a meaningful future is expatriation. There is nothing for us on the very country of our ancestors–unless we join an alienating system and accept betraying our peers for money or the hope of a career. Even then, many of us are facing a bleak future of ingrate works that leave us poorer than our parents, a life as second-tier citizens behind aggressive immigrants, an alien political class, public debt, and a daily war led against us by the media.
The National Front's public presence since 2002 has been a metapolitical blow. While it can hardly be considered as a savior of the homo europeanus, its very persistence is a thorn in the foot of the elites. If Marine Le Pen was elected as President, it would be another metapolitical blow, regardless of what she would actually do. The electoral success of the NF is good news beyond a doubt. Indeed, an important indicator of its rise is the arrival of careerists and Freemasons in her movement–in other words, a serious betting on its future. Marine has also genuflected to the organized Jewish community by claiming that “the NF is the better shield for French Jews.”
But even then, the infamous B'nai Brith maintains an anti-NF “republican” pact it has made with the mainstream political parties: no alliances allowed with the NF, all the alliances allowed against it. Thus, we have seen an alliance game among the mainstream actors on the Right and a score of zero departments for the Front, the first French party in term of number of votes. No, the NF isn't part of the “Republic” or the mainstream, and no one but us–but who is that us?–has any decisional power on the matter. There is an ever-growing trend of pro-NF vote and White awakening, but the alien and bobo elite are firmly holding against it by their own synergies.
Another answer, less political but much subtler on the metapolitical side, comes from the essayist Alain Soral and his think-tank Égalité & Réconciliation (Equality and Reconciliation). Basically, his venture aims to conciliate the original French with Muslims against “Zionism.” Soral emphasizes how a project like Attali's patronizes Muslims, leading them to “replace Allah by Mammon,” and following Jewish-nominated imams. Instead, his own project is a kind of bottom-up anti-globalist front. Soral's think-tank has been influential in spreading a critical outlook on Jewish power and influence. Still, it can hardly be considered as sustainable in the long term. It is a solution tailored for struggling against the globalist, alien alliance, and it may help for undermining it, but Soral's pro-Muslim view is shameful when one compares the richness of our civilization compared to Muslim dimness and disdain for European culture. The White-Muslim synergy built by E&R might be unstable, but is still an interesting counter-synergy, tailored for us–to a certain extent–and against our adversary.